October 11th-24th, 2025

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) has been directed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to temporarily pause the issuance of November Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits due to funding limitations from the ongoing federal shutdown. This nationwide delay affects approximately 42 million SNAP recipients, including roughly 1.4 million Michiganders. State officials warn that even a short-term interruption could significantly impact families that rely on SNAP to purchase groceries and household staples.

SNAP plays a central role in Michigan’s food and economic ecosystem with nearly 13% of households in the state participating in the program. The average individual receiving SNAP stands to lose $173 per month once the pause takes effect. Beyond helping families afford nutritious meals, SNAP dollars circulate back into the more than 9,700 Michigan businesses that accept SNAP, including grocers, farmers markets, and retail workers. MDHHS Director Elizabeth Hertel noted that the delay threatens both family food stability and the broader economic benefits SNAP provides.

With the situation evolving at the federal level, the state has signaled it will continue working to minimize the impact on families. However, until funding is restored, many Michigan households will face renewed uncertainty about how to keep food on the table.

The Senate Fiscal Agency (SFA) recently released Michigan’s Monthly Revenue Report for September. Total collections generated from major taxes and net lottery proceeds came in at $3.8 Billion, up 0.6% from SFA’s report one year ago. Despite this slight increase, revenue was still nearly $192 million below projections made during the Consensus Revenue Estimating Conference (CREC) this past May. Higher-than-expected Individual Income Tax (IIT) refunds and weaker Corporate Income Tax (CIT) collections were the primary drivers of the shortfall, though stronger returns from gaming-related revenue helped offset some losses. While September marks the end of the fiscal year on a calendar basis, the state’s accrual accounting practices mean that these totals represent eleven months of revenue activity.

General Fund and School Aid Fund tax collections also came up short by $183 million and $19.6 million, respectively. So far this fiscal year, General Fund collections are tracking $267.0 million below projections, while School Aid Fund revenue remains $76.5 million above expected levels. Income tax withholding was slightly higher than last year, but larger-than-anticipated refunds reduced net revenue. Sales tax receipts grew modestly year-over-year but still missed forecasts, and use tax revenue declined by nearly 10%. Corporate tax revenue also lagged significantly, down more than 36% from last September.

This week, members of the Senate Appropriations Committee reported on SB 596 (Anthony, D-Lansing) and HB 4420 (Kunse, R-Clare), legislation that would apply transparency measures for budget earmarks into state statute. In a unanimous vote, HB 4420 which outlines the requirements for the earmark request form, was approved by members. All but one legislator voted for SB 596, which would enact certain transparency requirements for legislative earmarks.

Both bills were substituted before being reported, with the S-1 substitute for SB 596 including several changes. The bill defines a “legislatively directed spending item” (LDSI) as an appropriation that provides a specific amount of money to a particular entity, local government, or project. It excludes funds tied to declared emergencies, formula-based programs, or services that are already required by law.

Earmarks would need to be reviewed by the originating chamber’s appropriations committee before inclusion in any bill or conference report. For-profit organizations would be ineligible for earmarks, while nonprofits must have operated in Michigan for at least three years, maintained a Michigan office for one year, and have a board of directors. The House and Senate would also be required to post earmark requests online within five business days of submission.

A second substitute was adopted for SB 596 to require that an earmark be submitted at least 10 days prior to being voted on by the legislature. The substitute also included parameters for giving either chamber the authority to require an earlier deadline for submitting earmarks. While the bill passed in the Senate 31-5, Speaker of the House Matt Hall (R-Richland Township) criticized the brief 10-day deadline for submitting earmarks and instead suggested a 90 day deadline would be optimal.

HB 4420’s S-2 substitute would require the legislator making the earmark request, and any cosponsors, to attach their name to the earmark. The name of the recipient and their address would also have to be included. A confirmation for nonprofit requirements detailed in SB 596’s S-1 would also be required. Each request would also need to include a statement confirming no conflict of interest and verification of the recipient’s nonprofit status or a statement that it is not-for-profit.

SB 596 is currently awaiting a committee hearing in the House Appropriations committee. HB 4420 has been placed on third reading in the Senate.

In a recently released report by the Citizens Research Council (CRC) of Michigan, they outlined how both Michigan schools and local governments took a significant revenue hit during the state budget process. Due to the fuel exemption from sales tax, funding for K-12 schools is set to lose $680 million per year. To offset this loss, included in the budget is an ensured additional sales tax revenue equal to the School Aid Fund revenue estimated loss that will be placed directly in the School Aid Fund. The budget also increased the School Aid Fund appropriations given to colleges and universities by $400 million, therefore reducing the amount given to K-12 schools by that amount. Around $280 million of the $680 million reduction to the School Aid Fund was backfilled for schools. Local governments will also lose $93 million because of the fuel sales tax exemption, though no funds were added in the budget to offset this loss in revenue sharing money.

Lawmakers resolved the roughly $1.1 billion budget gap projected over the summer by the CRC, which stemmed from federal tax and spending changes. They averted a $450 million loss in Medicaid funding by preserving insurance provider assessments and codified federal business tax updates at the state level, preventing an additional $670 million hit to revenues.

Also included in their report is an outline of the new revenues for road infrastructure in the budget. With the 6% sales tax on fuel no longer in effect, a flat 20 cent per gallon increase in the motor fuel tax rate was introduced. The revenue difference is minimal, as will be the effect on consumers at the pump. This approach shifts approximately $1 billion to transportation infrastructure. The budget also includes a 24% tax on the wholesale price of marijuana, which is projected to generate $420 million in road infrastructure. The $600 million annual income tax earmark for roads was also replaced with a new corporate income tax earmark, starting at $688 million in FY26 and growing to $1 billion by FY30. Although road funding in FY26 will dip due to delayed tax reform implementation, the plan is expected to generate a total of $2 billion in new annual transportation revenue starting in FY30.

The Senate Health Policy Committee heard testimony Wednesday on how the potential expiration of federal tax credits could affect Michigan residents. Officials warned that if Congress fails to renew the enhanced credits, about 40,000 Michiganders could lose their health insurance subsidies entirely, with many more facing steep premium increases. The committee will be considering a nonbinding resolution urging Congress and President Trump to make the credits permanent.

It will now be illegal for any individual, including players, coaches, and stadium staff, to use smokeless nicotine products inside any Detroit stadium. Violators will first receive a warning, but refusal to comply will result in a misdemeanor and $100 fine. City Council Member Fred Durhall III, who spearheaded the ban, said he was motivated after hearing from high school students who believed tobacco use was a normal part of baseball, adding that adults’ unhealthy habits are influencing kids.

Back in 2016, Major League Baseball (MLB) banned new players from using any tobacco products, such as chewing tobacco, which has been popular among players for decades and lead many to be diagnosed with oral cancer. This ban led many players to switch to tobacco-less nicotine products, such as Zyn pouches, which have seen a rise in popularity in recent years.

Supporters of the ban believe it’s prioritizing kids’ health while also discouraging the presence of addictive products in sports. Those in opposition to the ban, like Council Member Coleman Young II, argued that the city has no right limiting the freedom of adults to use legal products. Young pointed to the permitted sales of alcohol and unhealthy hotdogs as also having negative externalities. Council Member Gabriela Santiago-Romero also voted no, saying that since there are already nicotine bans at the stadium, the new ordinance will have minimal impact.