McCall Hamilton Advocacy and Public Affairs

Updates About Supreme Court Rulings

Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Increase and Tipped Wage Phase-In

Update: Sep 2-Oct 2, 2024

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order clarifying the implementation of the state’s minimum wage increase plan, confirming that the Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity and the Department of Treasury’s calculations were accurate. The court ruled that inflation adjustments should be calculated starting from January 1, 2019, through July 31, 2024, resulting in a gradual increase in the minimum wage to $12.48 in 2025 and up to $14.97 by 2028.

The court also addressed a missed phase-in percentage for tipped wages, clarifying that tipped workers’ wages would reach 100% of the regular minimum wage by 2030, correcting their initial projection of 2029. Justice Elizabeth Welch provided a concurring opinion, while Justices Brian Zahra and David Viviano dissented. Treasury must submit the finalized wage figures by November 1, 2024.

Supreme Court Overturns Chevron: Impact on Federal Agency Authority and Regulatory Landscape

Update: Jun 25-Jul 12, 2024

The United States Supreme Court’s recent decision to overturn the Chevron doctrine marks a significant shift in federal agency authority, impacting how regulations are interpreted and enforced across various sectors, including health care, environmental protection, and more. For decades, under Chevron, courts deferred to agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes, but now, judges will hold greater discretion in evaluating these interpretations themselves. The 6-3 ruling, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, emphasized that agencies do not possess unique expertise in resolving statutory gray areas and that courts must now independently scrutinize agency interpretations instead of deferring to them automatically.

The ruling has polarized opinions, with conservatives applauding it as a check on executive overreach and liberals warning of potential chaos and setbacks in regulatory protections. This decision is expected to lead to increased legal challenges to federal regulations and could reshape how future administrations navigate policy implementation amid judicial scrutiny. It also raises questions about the future of major policy initiatives as administrations navigate a landscape where judicial decisions play an increased role in shaping regulatory outcomes.

Supreme Court Decision Preserves Access to Abortion Pill

Update: Jun 11-24, 2024

The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to federal regulations surrounding the abortion medication mifepristone recently, which means continued access, most notably includes by mail to patients, to the medication here in Michigan. The decision, which rejected claims of health risks associated with the medication, disappointed challenge-advocates who had sought tighter restrictions.

Governor Gretchen Whitmer praised the ruling, emphasizing its importance in protecting reproductive rights as she stated, “Mifepristone will remain safe, legal, and available to Michiganders.”

This marks the first time the Supreme Court has addressed abortion since its 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.