Updates About Lower Court Rulings

Lansing District Judge Kristen Simmons rejected all criminal charges against a group of 15 Republican electors who forged a counterfeit public document containing their own signatures claiming that then-presidential candidate Donald Trump had won Michigan in the 2020 election.

Simmons ruled that the defendants were not culpable of any criminal activity because they were acting under the direction of Trump attorney Shawn Flynn, and the Michigan Attorney General’s office had failed to establish probable cause. Therefore, the electors believed they were exercising their constitutional right to raise concerns about election fraud to the U.S. Senate.

A federal court in northern California has issued a preliminary injunction preventing the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) from providing Medicaid recipients’ personal healthcare information to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The ruling comes after a coalition of attorneys general in several states, including Michigan’s Dana Nessel, challenged DHHS’ decision to share this private medical information for immigration enforcement purposes.

The court determined that DHHS and DHS had not done their due diligence through thorough consideration of how to limit the scope of medical information shared before suddenly changing their well-established privacy policy. The court order prevents DHHS from sharing Medicaid data with DHS until after the lawsuit is completed or a comprehensive rulemaking process weighing the legal ramifications has been conducted.

The U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled to uphold the constitutionality of Michigan’s Newborn Screening Program, allowing our state to continue one of its most critical public health efforts. This decision came when the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court ruling and confirmed that the state’s collection and use of de-identified newborn blood samples, used to screen for over 50 potentially life-threatening conditions, does not infringe on constitutional rights. The ruling also protects the BioTrust for Health, a research initiative that supports medical advancement through the use of privacy-protected samples.

Attorney General Dana Nessel and Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) Director Elizabeth Hertel both praised the decision as a win for families across the state. Since its launch in 1965, the Newborn Screening Program has enabled early diagnosis and treatment for thousands of Michigan infants who might otherwise have gone undiagnosed. With the court’s ruling, the program can continue to detect rare disorders in their earliest stages— when intervention is most effective— while also supporting responsible medical research that may benefit future generations.